PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

FTC Snags Another ISO

By Don Apgar
March 18, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Fraud & Security, Fraud Risk and Analytics, Merchant
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
FTC Snags Another ISO

FTC Snags Another ISO

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a long history of protecting consumers from scammers, fraudsters, and snake oil salesmen. In the analog 20th century, the FTC worked closely with the US Postal Service to rein in the get-rich-quick solicitations that were mailed by the millions, and the checks that were mailed back by so many hopeful buyers. In our digital era, the FTC pursues bad actors using the Watergate plan of “Follow the Money.” Schemers advertise in some very innovative places, but the funds roll into their coffers through electronic credit and debit card payments, and stopping their ability to accept cards effectively shuts down the fraud. 

This most recent case involves Money Now Funding (MNF), who in 2015 settled allegations with the FTC that it had telemarketed worthless business opportunities to consumers and falsely promised that consumers would earn thousands of dollars in income. Ordinarily this would be the end of the FTC’s involvement, but as in other cases, the FTC alleges that there was another possible layer of fraud at work here. The card networks police bad actors in the payments ecosystem by enforcing a chargeback limit at 1% of transactions. This means that if more than 1 of every 100 sales are disputed by consumers, the business is deemed to be fraudulent and excluded from accepting branded payment cards. 

In the case of MNF, their merchant processing services were provided by Independent Sales Organization (ISO) Electronic Payment Systems (EPS). The FTC alleges that EPS enabled the fraud perpetrated by MNF by opening 43 different merchant accounts that intentionally obscured the true nature of the underlying transactions and allowed MNF to avoid detection of exceeding the 1% chargeback threshold that would have alerted card network compliance teams. Many times, companies like MNF have difficulty gaining access to merchant card acceptance services, and companies willing to provide those services will charge fees significantly higher than a business like a restaurant would pay, making these types of accounts potentially very profitable for companies like EPS.

On March 15, the FTC released a consent agreement with EPS and its owners John Dorsey and Thomas McCann for allegedly opening credit card processing merchant accounts for fictitious companies on behalf of Money Now Funding (MNF).

“Companies involved in payment processing can’t ignore red flags that fraudsters are using the system to steal people’s money,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “It’s urgent that our authority to get money to consumers be restored, but in the meantime, we’ll do everything we can to stop scammers and those who help them.”

According to the EPS website, they are sponsored into the payment networks by Esquire Bank, of Jericho, NY, and to date no announcement has been made about whether sanctions will be applied to Esquire.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: ChargebackChargebacksFraudFraud DetectionFraud Risk and AnalyticsFTCMerchantMerchantsScamtelemarketing fraud

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Proof That Fintechs Are Disrupting Banks:

    In Today’s Fintech Market, Value Is Everything

    August 30, 2024
    DFAST test

    Dodd-Frank Stress Tests: Good News for Now, Watch for a Rugged 2025

    August 29, 2024
    Real-Time Payments Adoption in the U.S. Requires a Pragmatic Approach, ISO 20022 messaging challenges

    ISO 20022 Brings the Challenge of Standardization to Swift Participants

    August 28, 2024
    open banking small banks credit unions

    Open Banking Can Be an Equalizer for Small Banks and Credit Unions

    August 27, 2024
    Payments 3.0

    Achieving Seamless and Holistic Transactions with Payments 3.0

    August 26, 2024
    embedded finance, ecommerce, consumers reduce spending

    Quality Over Quantity: Key Priorities in the Payment Experience

    August 23, 2024
    bots fraud

    Next-Generation Bots Pose Formidable Fraud Challenge

    August 22, 2024
    crypto custodians

    Crypto Custodians Could Bring a Revolution in Holding Assets

    August 21, 2024

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Debit
    • Digital Banking
    Menu
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Debit
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    Menu
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    Menu
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result